8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael (XIAO Xufeng)
fefdee1349 bootloader: fix the WRSR format for ISSI flash chips
1. The 2nd bootloader always call `rom_spiflash_unlock()`, but never help to clear the WEL bit when exit. This may cause system unstability.

   This commit helps to clear WEL when flash configuration is done.

   **RISK:** When the app starts, it didn't have to clear the WEL before it actually write/erase. But now the very first write/erase operation should be done after a WEL clear. Though the risk is little (all the following write/erase also need to clear the WEL), we still have to test this carefully, especially for those functions used by the OTA.

2. The `rom_spiflash_unlock()` function in the patch of ESP32 may (1) trigger the QPI, (2) clear the QE or (3) fail to unlock the ISSI chips.

   Status register bitmap of ISSI chip and GD chip:

| SR | ISSI | GD25LQ32C |
| -- | ---- | --------- |
| 0  | WIP  | WIP       |
| 1  | WEL  | WEL       |
| 2  | BP0  | BP0       |
| 3  | BP1  | BP1       |
| 4  | BP2  | BP2       |
| 5  | BP3  | BP3       |
| 6  | QE   | BP4       |
| 7  | SRWD | SRP0      |
| 8  |      | SRP1      |
| 9  |      | QE        |
| 10 |      | SUS2      |
| 11 |      | LB1       |
| 12 |      | LB2       |
| 13 |      | LB3       |
| 14 |      | CMP       |
| 15 |      | SUS1      |

   QE bit of other chips are at the bit 9 of the status register (i.e. bit 1 of SR2), which should be read by RDSR2 command.

   However, the RDSR2 (35H, Read Status 2) command for chip of other vendors happens to be the QIOEN (Enter QPI mode) command of ISSI chips. When the `rom_spiflash_unlock()` function trys to read SR2, it may trigger the QPI of ISSI chips.

   Moreover, when `rom_spiflash_unlock()` try to clear the BP4 bit in the status register, QE (bit 6) of ISSI chip may be cleared by accident. Or if the ISSI chip doesn't accept WRSR command with argument of two bytes (since it only have status register of one byte), it may fail to clear the other protect bits (BP0~BP3) as expected.

   This commit makes the `rom_spiflash_unlock()` check whether the vendor is issi. if so, `rom_spiflash_unlock()` only send RDSR to read the status register, send WRSR with only 1 byte argument, and also avoid clearing the QE bit (bit 6).

3. `rom_spiflash_unlock()` always send WRSR command to clear protection bits even when there is no protection bit active. And the execution of clearing status registers, which takes about 700us, will also happen even when there's no bits cleared.

   This commit skips the clearing of status register if there is no protection bits active.

Also move the execute_flash_command to be a bootloader API; move
implementation of spi_flash_wrap_set to the bootloader
2020-09-19 10:51:51 +08:00
Supreet Deshpande
a9ccc5e5c8 feat/secure_boot_v2: Adding secure boot v2 support for ESP32-ECO3 2020-02-25 01:28:22 +05:30
morris
888316fc64 bootloader_support: refactor to better support multi target 2019-12-23 05:45:17 +00:00
Anton Maklakov
afbaf74007 tools: Mass fixing of empty prototypes (for -Wstrict-prototypes) 2019-08-01 16:28:56 +07:00
Vikram Dattu
eb99b27f2e Bugfix: ota fails with secure boot on for image size greater than 3.2MB
When an OTA image size is larger than 50 MMU pages (approx. 3.2 MB), secure_boot_generate fails while trying to map it into memory:
https://gitlab.espressif.cn:6688/idf/esp-idf/blob/master/components/bootloader_support/src/esp32/secure_boot.c#L72
Instead of trying to map the whole image, secure boot code should split the image into chunks and map them one by one, like it is done in esp_image_format.c:
https://gitlab.espressif.cn:6688/idf/esp-idf/blob/master/components/bootloader_support/src/esp_image_format.c#L372

Closes https://jira.espressif.com:8443/browse/IDF-709

Signed-off-by: Vikram Dattu <vikram.dattu@espressif.com>
2019-07-01 20:04:15 +00:00
Ivan Grokhotkov
96d0f7f5e2 bootloader: account for load address when mapping cache pages
Bootloader used to calculate the number of cache pages assuming that
load address was aligned, while in reality load address for DROM and
IROM was offset by 0x20 bytes from the start of 64kB page. This
caused the bootloader to map one less page if the size of the image
was 0x4..0x1c less than a multiple of 64kB.

Reported in https://esp32.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=6952.
2019-01-19 14:44:55 +08:00
Mahavir Jain
62746e414e bootloader: add API for erasing flash region
Signed-off-by: Mahavir Jain <mahavir@espressif.com>
2018-08-29 12:04:32 +00:00
Angus Gratton
fbec7de7f8 bootloader_support: Rename include_priv directory to include_bootloader
Old rationale for "priv" no longer applies.

As reported here: https://esp32.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=6155&p=27151#p26601
2018-07-23 15:58:27 +10:00